From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30932 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2015 09:06:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30917 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2015 09:06:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f48.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.220.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:06:29 +0000 Received: by pacwv17 with SMTP id wv17so21252783pac.0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.130.198 with SMTP id og6mr4263395pdb.153.1429866387794; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nb10sm10447461pdb.76.2015.04.24.02.06.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:06:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] Teach non-stop to do in-line step-overs (stop all, step, restart) References: <1429267521-21047-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1429267521-21047-10-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <86tww9y18h.fsf@gmail.com> <5537FE7F.8050007@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5537FE7F.8050007@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:03:11 +0100") Message-ID: <86d22tyjxu.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00928.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves writes: > I think so, yes. Though I'd rather leave it be for a while, > so that the "maint set target-non-stop off" fallback option > is fully functional as backup plan. In the long term, if we manage > to merge linux-nat.c and gdbserver/linux-low.c, the resulting > code will still need it as long as we'd like to support gdbserver > connected to a gdb that doesn't force non-stop mode though, and, > probably as long as gdbserver's own step-over-breakpoints/tracepoints > implementation is baked in the backend too. :-/ Hmm, that is OK. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)