From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12146 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2002 11:57:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12139 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 11:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 11:57:54 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gB7BvilU000285; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:57:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gB7BviCC000357; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:57:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gB7BviMD000354; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:57:44 +0100 (CET) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/i386] Make codestream deprecated? References: <3DEAAB57.4070609@redhat.com> From: Mark Kettenis Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 10:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of "Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:37:43 -0500" Message-ID: <86bs3yoxc7.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > 2002-12-01 Andrew Cagney > > * i386-tdep.c: Replace `codestream' with `deprecated_codestream'. Sorry, but I'm not really enthousiastic about this patch. IMHO a comment explaining the reason why one shouldn't copy this bit of code would be much better. I'm willing to rip out this bit of code, and replace it with something cleaner and simpler, but this "deprication" is only noise to me. Mark