From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id w1zpJ83uB2EeSQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:10:37 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 99CCF1EDFB; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C751E4A3 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABD93857402 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:10:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4ABD93857402 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1627909833; bh=0y7FIxKLl7xKEYdnaIs7stVFysu0VuuNvR763GscObQ=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=Ym4L2MnZyClPhnGf1EPqTeyZ1j9/VUaai7dWqt9wgCB1nwq1y3fPoROFO1Fl7Jm9W qz6+NJYQQp0CZ+ggfiESnS0f64UtMtPt4Q7LGtNv4EMNe0sGxcVeORvuUfat8afSYI CfCe34kKeVA0xOBxsa4rX1EK6Jc6PlLg/FsbhwR8= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328DA3853C2A for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:09:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 328DA3853C2A Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 172D9Pa1008956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:09:30 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 172D9Pa1008956 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22F601E4A3; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:09:25 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH master + 11][gdb/symtab] Fix zero address complaint for shlib To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210729212317.GA8528@delia> <27cf76cf-b650-6b2e-e260-292f91db96e7@polymtl.ca> <8e1b2a6e-dedb-3184-713f-381c8b51be0b@polymtl.ca> <31b389e1-fbfc-cdfa-14dd-5a4a99167430@suse.de> Message-ID: <86940b5e-76ba-fe28-eff1-2e3af832af70@polymtl.ca> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:09:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <31b389e1-fbfc-cdfa-14dd-5a4a99167430@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:09:25 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Where it says: > +# The .c files use __attribute__. > +if [get_compiler_info] { > + return -1 > +} The .c files don't seem to use __attribute__. I'm also wondering why we use this for these tests: > +if !$gcc_compiled { > + verbose "Skipping $gdb_test_file_name." > + return 0 > +} The test runs fine with CC_FOR_TARGET=clang, for example (with the trivial fix to make main return int). Simon