From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25424 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2015 09:26:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25409 invoked by uid 89); 10 Apr 2015 09:26:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f173.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f173.google.com) (209.85.192.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:26:24 +0000 Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so17100850pde.3 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:26:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.14.33 with SMTP id m1mr1033370pdc.123.1428657982932; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yy2sm1603585pbb.6.2015.04.10.02.26.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:26:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop References: <1428410990-28560-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <86lhi0v1el.fsf@gmail.com> <55278B2B.1070809@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <55278B2B.1070809@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:34:51 +0100") Message-ID: <868ue0uyfa.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves writes: > Fun. TBC, that was only with gdbserver, right? > Right, I just run non-stop-fair-events.exp on native aarch64-linux gdb, they all pass. > I suspect the test was only passing by change before though. They pass before this change. > AFAICS, aarch64 doesn't have a displaced stepping implementation. No, aarch64 doesn't have. > I'd suspect current master fails other non-stop tests? (and hopefully > this series fixes them). Current master doesn't fail other non-stop tests on aarch64-linux. This series doesn't change the test result except non-stop-fair-events.exp. > > So GDB should now be falling back to stopping all threads to > step past the breakpoint on aarch64, while before threads were > just missing breakpoints. Likely something wrong with that > with remote targets still. I'll take a look, and see if I can find anything wrong. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)