From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11614 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2015 14:32:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11494 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2015 14:32:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f178.google.com) (209.85.192.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:32:48 +0000 Received: by pdbqm3 with SMTP id qm3so41467167pdb.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:32:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.190.228 with SMTP id gt4mr42846932pac.72.1436538766524; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h12sm9787881pdk.77.2015.07.10.07.32.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:32:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] Fix testsuite regression by: Do not skip prologue for asm (.S) files References: <20150629163708.GA28795@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86lheol7wz.fsf@gmail.com> <20150710114743.GA12225@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150710114743.GA12225@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:47:43 +0200") Message-ID: <868uaokrqw.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil writes: > Names of the testcases involved, it was always written this way for whate= ver > reason, unless it has changed: > > +gdb_test "f" "asmsrc1\[.\]s:$line_enter.*gdbasm_enter" "f at main" > + > +# Execute the `n' command. > +gdb_test "n" "$line_main\[ \]*.*several_nops" "n at main" I don't know such convention of writing changelog entry for .exp changes. We usually put the proc or variable name into the parenthesis, like, * gdb.foo/bar.exp (proc_name): XXXX Is it documented somewhere? --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)