From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22375 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2016 13:54:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22360 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2016 13:54:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-pf0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f171.google.com) (209.85.192.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:54:21 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c20so36323252pfc.1 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ti2oLYZFYIS38IYIHjUwj+BddJBfQAlaYRWOpIvZTbc=; b=EcCxu/Hcr4uS9o/d4WfRKqUDGFYZXwDmDWQJY2FKkc2/Ak5nnGNZJhb1SPAjmjRC2M aZEumMTf4/F/pRCRNr8MXjOctOaCX3FkIgKe0x4WDU2zqDXRwGcn872JL2QvL3Mk/5ut iTtpviqxbSfNykNl4ZVQPIvHHRrHmIIsNTFVdQ+A1o8AxE4EmZXykgQyo9JDZ12OOuXc nBOa+ESAsGsPRm9OYSr+/Sa8g+1G9l+3jRRl9NqP8cIrBb3OZDvcznMkxL8n+qVvgVY1 A4P5ZAeSheUMreKO/J5/TIxqcSd7cKZ0HNiPetXw6QXrQMOACyRf6T9ocM+KiU5XLJvL yz2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKUlUgwQ8WAt9ReQ0MnDg7OJgKzjd8T/6Qew/uc5roGkX8iTpphG/b+XHgyGOfK5Q== X-Received: by 10.98.10.74 with SMTP id s71mr21004415pfi.86.1459778059298; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 06:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ml5sm680605pab.2.2016.04.04.06.54.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 06:54:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Bernhard Heckel Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Keven Boell Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fort_dyn_array: Use value constructor instead of raw-buffer manipulation. References: <1458204189-13267-1-git-send-email-bernhard.heckel@intel.com> <1458204189-13267-4-git-send-email-bernhard.heckel@intel.com> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1458204189-13267-4-git-send-email-bernhard.heckel@intel.com> (Bernhard Heckel's message of "Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:43:09 +0100") Message-ID: <868u0tpji4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 Bernhard Heckel writes: > Instead of pre-computing indices into a fortran array re-use > the value_* interfaces to subscript a fortran array. Hi, can you elaborate a little please? It looks like change to new interface, but why does this fix the bug? because value_* interfaces have been aware of dynamic type? --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)