From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/7] Support software single step on ARM in GDBServer
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8660z6ydkq.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450361684-29536-6-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> (Antoine Tremblay's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:14:42 -0500")
Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> writes:
Hi Antoine,
> +/* Find the next possible PCs for thumb mode. */
> +VEC (CORE_ADDR) *thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
> + CORE_ADDR pc);
> +
> +/* Find the next possible PCs for arm mode. */
> +VEC (CORE_ADDR) *arm_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
> + CORE_ADDR pc);
> +
> +#endif /* ARM_GET_NEXT_PCS_H */
Is there any reason to make them extern? I have a patch below to make
them static. What do you think?
--
Yao (齐尧)
From 69e090308baae43f6d5ee80188c935cd701448ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:41:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Make {arm,thumb}_get_next_pcs_raw static
This patch makes arm_get_next_pcs_raw and thumb_get_next_pcs_raw
static.
gdb:
2016-01-06 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* arch/arm-get-next-pcs.c (arm_get_next_pcs): Move it to some
lines below.
(thumb_get_next_pcs_raw): Make it static.
(arm_get_next_pcs_raw): Likewise.
* arch/arm-get-next-pcs.h (thumb_get_next_pcs_raw): Remove the
declaration.
(arm_get_next_pcs_raw): Likewise.
diff --git a/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.c b/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.c
index 4db74e7..aba45e3 100644
--- a/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.c
+++ b/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.c
@@ -258,34 +258,10 @@ arm_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
return next_pcs;
}
-/* See arm-get-next-pcs.h. */
-
-VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
-arm_get_next_pcs (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self, CORE_ADDR pc)
-{
- VEC (CORE_ADDR) *next_pcs = NULL;
-
- if (self->ops->is_thumb (self))
- {
- next_pcs = thumb_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw (self, pc);
- if (next_pcs == NULL)
- next_pcs = thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (self, pc);
- }
- else
- {
- next_pcs = arm_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw (self, pc);
- if (next_pcs == NULL)
- next_pcs = arm_get_next_pcs_raw (self, pc);
- }
+/* Find the next possible PCs for thumb mode. */
- return next_pcs;
-}
-
-/* See arm-get-next-pcs.h. */
-
-VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
-thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
- CORE_ADDR pc)
+static VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
+thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self, CORE_ADDR pc)
{
int byte_order = self->byte_order;
int byte_order_for_code = self->byte_order_for_code;
@@ -664,9 +640,8 @@ thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
in Thumb-State, and gdbarch_addr_bits_remove () to get the plain memory
address in GDB and arm_addr_bits_remove in GDBServer. */
-VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
-arm_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
- CORE_ADDR pc)
+static VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
+arm_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self, CORE_ADDR pc)
{
int byte_order = self->byte_order;
unsigned long pc_val;
@@ -924,3 +899,26 @@ arm_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
VEC_safe_push (CORE_ADDR, next_pcs, nextpc);
return next_pcs;
}
+
+/* See arm-get-next-pcs.h. */
+
+VEC (CORE_ADDR) *
+arm_get_next_pcs (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self, CORE_ADDR pc)
+{
+ VEC (CORE_ADDR) *next_pcs = NULL;
+
+ if (self->ops->is_thumb (self))
+ {
+ next_pcs = thumb_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw (self, pc);
+ if (next_pcs == NULL)
+ next_pcs = thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (self, pc);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ next_pcs = arm_deal_with_atomic_sequence_raw (self, pc);
+ if (next_pcs == NULL)
+ next_pcs = arm_get_next_pcs_raw (self, pc);
+ }
+
+ return next_pcs;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.h b/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.h
index fdbc9bc..895e866 100644
--- a/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.h
+++ b/gdb/arch/arm-get-next-pcs.h
@@ -59,12 +59,4 @@ void arm_get_next_pcs_ctor (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
VEC (CORE_ADDR) *arm_get_next_pcs (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
CORE_ADDR pc);
-/* Find the next possible PCs for thumb mode. */
-VEC (CORE_ADDR) *thumb_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
- CORE_ADDR pc);
-
-/* Find the next possible PCs for arm mode. */
-VEC (CORE_ADDR) *arm_get_next_pcs_raw (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
- CORE_ADDR pc);
-
#endif /* ARM_GET_NEXT_PCS_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 14:14 [PATCH v8 0/7] Support software single step and conditional breakpoints " Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] Support software single step " Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-21 13:58 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-04 12:59 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-06 14:23 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-06 14:36 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-06 14:56 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-06 14:58 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-06 14:42 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-01-06 14:50 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-06 15:04 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-13 16:13 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-13 19:10 ` Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] Share some ARM target dependent code from GDB with GDBServer Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] Enable software single stepping for while-stepping actions in GDBServer Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] Replace breakpoint_reinsert_addr by get_next_pcs operation " Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] Refactor arm_software_single_step to use regcache Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-18 10:35 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-18 13:07 ` Yao Qi
2016-01-18 14:02 ` Antoine Tremblay
2016-01-21 7:52 ` Yao Qi
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] Enable conditional breakpoints for targets that support software single step in GDBServer Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-17 14:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] Share regcache function regcache_raw_read_unsigned Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-18 12:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] Support software single step and conditional breakpoints on ARM in GDBServer Antoine Tremblay
2015-12-18 16:45 ` Antoine Tremblay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8660z6ydkq.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox