From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: NEED FEEDBACK: time to start the GDB 8.2 release process (2018-05-30 update)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 09:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85BCF124-2063-4309-A836-FD35C0AB7A81@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180530225306.jbf5xtpgvkmno7md@adacore.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1674 bytes --]
> On 30 May 2018, at 23:53, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Although 8.1.1 is not entirely out yet, I think we should start working
> on GDB 8.2 now, rather than wait more. Looking at the NEWS files,
> we have a reasonable list of new features to warrant a new release.
>
> The initial plan, published at https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/schedule/,
> called for a branch on Jun 15th, so 2 weeks from now. In internet time,
> this is quite a short time-frame, but perhaps we'll be able to make it?
>
> Does anyone have projects that are nearly finished and would be
> important to include in 8.2 rather than wait for 8.3? If yes,
> what kind of time frame can we expect for getting those in.
> Should we wait for the patch to be in master before we cut the branch,
> or can the changes be backported afterwards?
Iâd very much like to get SVE support into 8.2.
What that entails is:
1) Enable for gdb: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-05/msg00755.html
2) Enable for gdbserver
3) Small fix to un-break core files on see
4) Add dwarf registers
2 and 3 are fairly short and should probably be rolled into a V2 of 1.
4 is trivial.
Hopefully all recache and target description changes over the past year
means all the contentious parts of the sve patches have been solved.
This would give full register dumps on aarch64 sve programs.
However, core dumps will be missing sve registers and any program
that changes vector length on the fly will cause an error (this
is expected to be very rare in the wild). The plan is to fix both
of those for 8.3
Alan.\x16º&Öéj×!zÊÞ¶êç×ü×Ùb²Ö«r\x18\x1dnr\x17¬
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-31 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-30 23:09 Joel Brobecker
2018-05-31 9:23 ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2018-05-31 18:35 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-05-31 18:35 ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-31 21:20 ` Philippe Waroquiers
2018-05-31 19:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-06-01 17:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-06-01 21:42 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-06-11 22:52 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85BCF124-2063-4309-A836-FD35C0AB7A81@arm.com \
--to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox