From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B2493851C2C for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:15:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0B2493851C2C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E8411E794; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gdb/breakpoint: set the condition exp after parsing the condition successfully To: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <341eb335-db50-82ce-4dc9-2b5d53765dd6@simark.ca> <368bbad3-67c4-1422-9006-8a37ac49be34@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <85805cfb-c611-cb70-557e-62d25710abe9@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:15:28 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:15:36 -0000 On 2020-07-30 6:56 a.m., Aktemur, Tankut Baris wrote: > On Thursday, July 23, 2020 9:11 AM, Aktemur, Tankut Baris wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 22, 2020 6:06 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >>> Ok, so do you want to wait and post everything together, or do still want to consider >>> merging this one on its own, since it's still a step forward? >> >> I'd like to merge this on its own. > > Hi Simon, > > OK to push the two-pass version? > > Thanks > -Baris Yes, go ahead. Simon