From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354339494B4 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 16:24:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F354339494B4 Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-406-r-aNjDoDPGqAjx88pISGug-1; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:24:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: r-aNjDoDPGqAjx88pISGug-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l2so1471488wmi.2 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v9oIfXNBK2ub/U4EU05VwobOgNvh6z3p3II0FsmrZYM=; b=EUu27RozzRRkYqCTJhO+of1Q4CPiuKGwLLQtqzc4xFaX0jBNUw7NxTz4RIr1+LltT+ 3FxlIQQEFrSsnC/uP4JI9uLNRuhWNl4WCH2/4WoNhpt9QtQ9WjK4oNITlV2f9rDYN9s9 IyQdoRevl9aK1uZS3EKeZ6Apzx4SL3Cpcvci2Sd5JURE2uot4tFWOqOI1/+ojLwSY6jT VwS1mcPjE0bWTXekLRF/+oF66B5RGOCGnGUnaRlU6r5AkKzIPH+Q1k8EpDgPI7rzK3gV FxbCOb5IJ7dx12rioTtv6EDyoxHtAMFO+RDfvS75Ir7PGIPu7ix08+/tx6qwpPLsKj8Z 9U1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ku1209o9WW4LTrOq7bevQ+XV/LeuKy6tElRZApy41KrlxF4bP th10Mj/YmXL+eoBWNBzqwe7ekG/vdImgLMT2dPgs3i2coNGFVynE28GN84TJLzb2sxb3Vw6Fqa3 qweudv9taMKxUcrrh05JKEg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f783:: with SMTP id q3mr4713472wrp.348.1589991857602; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7pEiGue/ES6HlQXLSsla9Zc5LgF88ocQRXiYwnei496+dpeMufxEvz0Yh6xJ8cZt3eox2cg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f783:: with SMTP id q3mr4713463wrp.348.1589991857473; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f909:7b00:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f909:7b00:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm3561666wro.12.2020.05.20.09.24.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 May 2020 09:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] Adjust corefile.exp test to show regression after bfd hack removal To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20200513171155.645761-1-kevinb@redhat.com> <20200513171155.645761-3-kevinb@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <851cf0a3-6476-e820-10ff-5d89ce7ac624@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:24:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200513171155.645761-3-kevinb@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:24:22 -0000 On 5/13/20 6:11 PM, Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches wrote: > In his review of my BZ 25631 patch series, Pedro was unable to > reproduce the regression which should occur after patch #1, "Remove > hack for GDB which sets the section size to 0", is applied. Thanks, I confirm that I can see the regression with this. Pedro Alves