From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115379 invoked by alias); 27 May 2016 13:48:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 115258 invoked by uid 89); 27 May 2016 13:48:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=symmetry, responses X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:48:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D69A994; Fri, 27 May 2016 13:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4RDmCVV002888; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:48:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document short responses to qXfer:object:read. To: Eli Zaretskii References: <25526.1464294807@usendtaylorx2l> <83k2if290w.fsf@gnu.org> <5625464e-c351-27f3-9fca-d6cd22303118@redhat.com> <8360tz1vs7.fsf@gnu.org> Cc: dtaylor@emc.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <8500ac65-6473-ec7b-9445-9e3bf6108f9a@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8360tz1vs7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On 05/27/2016 02:21 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> From: Pedro Alves >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:55:03 +0100 >> >> On 05/27/2016 09:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>> Finally, it looks to me that we should move the description of the >>> responses to precede the details of the 'read' requests, since the >>> list of those requests is very long, and thus the promised description >>> of the responses "below" is very far away, which IMO gets in the way >>> of reading and comprehending the issue. >> >> Fully agreed. > > The patch for that is below; OK? LGTM. I think that for symmetry, it be good to do the same to qxfer:object:write, even though the list of specific write requests isn't as large. Thanks, Pedro Alves