From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5672 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 18:22:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 5662 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2009 18:22:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:22:39 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KI700F00GT6UD00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:22:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.34.97]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KI70047ZHPFGJB1@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:22:28 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:22:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Allow GDB to search for the right libthread_db.so.1 In-reply-to: To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: ppluzhnikov@google.com, bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83zlegjw5t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20090406203920.CCD6F19C4EC@localhost> <1239225742.8871.145.camel@localhost.localdomain> <8ac60eac0904101205h76d8377cv843db8177e74f8af@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 > Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , gdb-patches ml > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:53:58 -0600 > > Paul> I think "Debugging Programs with Multiple Threads" section is the most > Paul> appropriate place, but I am not sure. > > It seems reasonable to me, but perhaps Eli could provide his opinion. Yes, that's reasonable: we generally document such variables together with the features to which they are tied, cf. "set solib-search-path", for example.