From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-67764-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18002 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2009 08:33:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 17993 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2009 08:33:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:33:39 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KRN00C00GYJLI00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:33:20 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.117.47]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KRN00CAGH3I8R10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:33:19 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:33:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] Allow to disassemble line.
In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0910161611u7056433m8912ce9ac5a83134@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83zl7qh163.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20091002004954.8966C76B2B@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com> <8ac60eac0910080916i5a2eb49an5f21f3b5c7fb96ef@mail.gmail.com> <20091008162350.GA8625@caradoc.them.org> <8ac60eac0910080952p46f15693x6ed339473db0139d@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0910161607k55fee22cs379c5b7635d7b6a@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0910161611u7056433m8912ce9ac5a83134@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:27 -0700
> From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
> 
> (top) set disassemble-next-line on
> (top) ni
> 0x000000000054d225      510           val = func (func_args);
>   0x000000000054d221 <catch_errors+69>:  48 8b 7d d0    mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdi
> * 0x000000000054d225 <catch_errors+73>:  48 8b 45 d8    mov    -0x28(%rbp),%rax
>   0x000000000054d229 <catch_errors+77>:  ff d0  callq  *%rax
>   0x000000000054d22b <catch_errors+79>:  89 45 fc       mov    %eax,-0x4(%rbp)
> (top) ni
> 0x000000000054d229      510           val = func (func_args);
>   0x000000000054d221 <catch_errors+69>:  48 8b 7d d0    mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdi
>   0x000000000054d225 <catch_errors+73>:  48 8b 45 d8    mov    -0x28(%rbp),%rax
> * 0x000000000054d229 <catch_errors+77>:  ff d0  callq  *%rax
>   0x000000000054d22b <catch_errors+79>:  89 45 fc       mov    %eax,-0x4(%rbp)

The asterisk in both cases is on the same mnemonics, "callq  *%rax".
Is that a bug or a "feature"?