From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22437 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2015 13:09:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22422 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2015 13:09:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout24.012.net.il Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il (HELO mtaout24.012.net.il) (80.179.55.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:02 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLV00L00FWSCG00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:01:23 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLV00M2VG6BHQ00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:01:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:09:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] compile: New 'compile print' In-reply-to: <55152EED.6060902@redhat.com> To: Phil Muldoon Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83zj6ya8pi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150326205727.28223.54648.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150326205752.28223.24230.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83iodmnc18.fsf@gnu.org> <20150327073333.GA28529@host1.jankratochvil.net> <83d23unazo.fsf@gnu.org> <55150D18.6020308@redhat.com> <838uein6un.fsf@gnu.org> <20150327091617.GA1488@host1.jankratochvil.net> <834mp6bw71.fsf@gnu.org> <55152EED.6060902@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00902.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 10:20:29 +0000 > From: Phil Muldoon > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Other than the edits you have suggested (thank you for those!) do you > have any additional documentation edits that might help to address the > preconceived notions the user might have? No. I don't think it's an issue that documentation can solve.