From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98246 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2015 17:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 98236 invoked by uid 89); 24 Aug 2015 17:34:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:34:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NTL00A00KP8NF00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:34:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NTL00A37KTLIUB0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 20:34:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:34:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add "set remote multiprocess-extensions-packet" command In-reply-to: <55DB54DC.1070100@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83zj1gfv4x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1440436237-24015-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1440436237-24015-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <8337z8h9zn.fsf@gnu.org> <55DB54DC.1070100@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00697.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:31:08 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On 08/24/2015 06:28 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > >> 2015-08-24 Pedro Alves > >> > >> * gdb.texinfo (Remote Configuration): Document the "set/show > >> remote multiprocess-extensions-packet" commands. > > > > What the ChangeLog entry promises the text doesn't keep: > > AFAIK, that's really all there is to document this kind of > set remote foo-packet commands. Above that table we have: > > For each packet @var{name}, the command to enable or disable the > packet is @code{set remote @var{name}-packet}. Strange habit, but who am I to object? Thanks.