From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JqxoOCuYul85LgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:56:11 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D901F1F0AB; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:56:11 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805C21E58D for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:56:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33DF3858009; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:56:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D33DF3858009 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1606064170; bh=rsE6+U3pzaKvnk9CcLJyh7IxXC+xttl4gtJnRZsOb4c=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=YTufran6+jx7izLYODYsjpw+qN0o6sDhWaxAeryZgRKJBd9sT5piiqF8FwHg+cIB4 txmubxYrD5XLFzeoqORPgXEVp+XxLQ0RgvBO3Sb+PU5NjP200wkPbtUCVjsSke5K7w 8elqc7kgWloO9zk5ySc9M4Ad7WxqQnsC2quBqwOY= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E030D3858009 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:56:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E030D3858009 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgsel-0008DF-HA; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:56:07 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2148 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kgseh-0000M5-CM; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:56:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:55:57 +0200 Message-Id: <83zh39wcte.fsf@gnu.org> To: gmail Vladimir =?utf-8?Q?Kokovi=C4=87?= In-Reply-To: (message from gmail Vladimir =?utf-8?Q?Kokovi=C4=87?= on Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:35:03 +0100) Subject: Re: mingw --enable-tui References: <83h7phxvb0.fsf@gnu.org> <562f0b99-1fd9-27d4-997e-d4e53c790d03@gmail.com> <833611xswf.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: gmail Vladimir Koković > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:35:03 +0100 > > For mingw, pdcurses is used, not ncurses. > > pdcurses curses.h: > > #if defined( CHTYPE_32) > #if defined( CHTYPE_64) > #error CHTYPE cannot be both CHTYPE_32 and CHTYPE_64 > #endif > typedef uint32_t chtype; /* chtypes will be 32 bits */ > #else > #define CHTYPE_64 > typedef uint64_t chtype; /* chtypes will be 64 bits */ > #ifdef PDC_WIDE > #define USING_COMBINING_CHARACTER_SCHEME > #endif > #endif Thanks, then I guess the condition should be for PDCurses, not necessarily for MinGW64. I see no reason to assume that MinGW64 GDB will always be built with PDCurses.