From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24420 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2009 04:05:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 24330 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2009 04:05:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:05:01 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVI008000HH5K00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:04:23 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVI006KX0NAO460@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:04:23 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:05:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support the new PPC476 processor In-reply-to: <20091230221535.GA25399@caradoc.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tyrlik@us.ibm.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y6kjdbxj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20091230221535.GA25399@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:15:35 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, > tyrlik@us.ibm.com > > > Thanks for the explanations. I think we should emulate this on > > architectures that don't have this in hardware (it doesn't sound > > hard). > > How do you mean? It seems basically impossible to me. How is it impossible to put several breakpoints covering a range of addresses?