From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-78016-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10311 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2011 18:19:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 10302 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2011 18:19:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:19:33 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG300E00UKDJR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:19:31 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG300DJWUWHQSB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:19:31 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:19:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR mi/10693
In-reply-to: <m3d3n7ag0t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83y65vachx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3oc7oldow.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201101102348.04761.pedro@codesourcery.com> <m37hdfbwtz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3d3n7ag0t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:03:30 -0700
> 
> Tom> So I think we should instead just document that symbols-loaded is
> Tom> emitted for compatibility but is not actually useful.
> 
> Like this.
> 
> Ok?

Yes, thanks.