From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13633 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2011 19:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 13611 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2011 19:59:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:59:10 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LHR00C008PWW300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:58:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.58.59]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LHR00CGL8TZAJA0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:58:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:38:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching In-reply-to: <201103081941.p28Jf0Uq027041@greed.delorie.com> To: DJ Delorie Cc: ktietz70@googlemail.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y64pfkp4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83aah5h34g.fsf@gnu.org> <201103081941.p28Jf0Uq027041@greed.delorie.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:41:00 -0500 > From: DJ Delorie > CC: ktietz70@googlemail.com, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > > I see no harm in having both, for completeness, though. I don't see any need for completeness in this case. But it's your call. I still think that the documentation should be fixed, though.