From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22811 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2011 14:08:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 22803 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Aug 2011 14:08:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:08:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LPX00A008LYMJ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:08:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.188.52]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LPX007BN8M8Z9M0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:08:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:08:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] An implementation of pipe to make I/O communication between gdb and shell. [MinGW question] In-reply-to: <20110814121407.GA29236@host1.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com, sergiodj@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y5ywulun.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pqkjx578.fsf@gnu.org> <20110813205053.GB22058@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110814121407.GA29236@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:14:08 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , Eli Zaretskii , > tromey@redhat.com, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Sorry for the typo. I meant to say I am NOT sure whether the given > > solution will work in windows platform. > > I guess it will work in Cygwin but it probably does not work in MinGW but that > is outside of my knowledge, MinGW advice needed, thanks for noticing it. Where's the issue about which you need MinGW advice? What exactly might not work? Can you please point me to the relevant message(s)? This has been a long thread, and I admit I didn't read all of it. I tried to locate the issue a few messages back, but couldn't find anything appropriate. Thanks.