From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14335 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2012 18:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 14326 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2012 18:28:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:28:16 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCI00A00J5XKG00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:28:09 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCI00AU6JAXK010@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:28:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:28:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: FYI: another @itemx in the remote protocol docs In-reply-to: <874nlh2j2a.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y5it84w3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874nlh2j2a.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:18:37 -0600 > > In my earlier patch, I missed a case where @itemx should be used. > > I'm checking this in as obvious. Thanks.