From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4677 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2013 09:41:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4664 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2013 09:41:49 -0000 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:41:49 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSN00900C44T900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:41:46 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSN009X2C9KGV90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:41:44 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/8] Intel(R) MPX register support In-reply-to: <1378373188-31144-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> To: Walfred Tedeschi Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y57bbo6q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1378373188-31144-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 > From: Walfred Tedeschi > Cc: Walfred Tedeschi > Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:26:20 +0200 > > This patch series adds support for the Intel(R) Memory Protection > Extension MPX registers. Native and remote debugging are covered > by this patch. Thanks. What are the reasons that this is support is being added only for GNU/Linux targets? IOW, what parts of the patch will not work if applied to other Intel-based targets?