Re: [RFA] nameless LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENT causes ntdll.dll to be missing

Joel Brobecker
2013-12-13T11:04:26Z

> Not speaking for or against the plan, but I don't recall that the
> current restriction was based on directory structure. With
> ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR, we can build libiberty within gdbserver's build
> dir, like we do gnulib (see below), so it seems that's a non-issue
> (even if that was is not the cleanest). Rather, the main issue was
> that libiberty won't build out of the box on some of the gdbserver
> targets, like Windows CE and Lynx, IIRC. CE is probably already
> broken for a while, so it's fine with me to not have it block such a
> change.

The patch only configures libiberty without building it, but going into
that build subdirectory and doing "make", I get a libiberty.a archive
for both ppc-lynx178 and x86-lynx5. So, if CE is not a blocker,
I think we could go ahead.

But this would really only be used by Windows, though, so delay
for after the branch?

--
Joel