From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-110447-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4533 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2014 21:13:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 4523 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2014 21:13:54 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout26.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il (HELO mtaout26.012.net.il) (80.179.55.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:13:53 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1500700S5FH200@mtaout26.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:12:15 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N15006W6S8EUX00@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:12:15 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:13:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
In-reply-to: <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83y519788a.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <wrbvbwejihe.fsf@sspiff.org> <wrbr471jxjg.fsf@sspiff.org> <834n3x8o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:59:22 -0800
> From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, guile-devel@gnu.org
> 
> >> +void
> >> +gdbscm_initialize_sigint (void)
> >> +{
> >> +  siscm_sigint_pipe[0] = siscm_sigint_pipe[1] = -1;
> >> +
> >> +  if (!SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS)
> >> +    {
> >> +      warning (_("Guile does not have pthreads support."));
> >> +      warning (_("Proper SIGINT handling for Guile will be unavailable."));
> >> +      return;
> >> +    }
> >
> > The above is what worries me.  Guile currently doesn't work in the
> > native MinGW build if configured with threads (it crashes, hangs,
> > etc.).  Can't we have decent SIGINT handling without pthreads?
> 
> With 2.0.x, no.
> I'm ok with changing the warning, e.g., not printing it at all on
> systems where it would otherwise always be printed, and instead
> documenting the issue for such systems.
> 
> The downside is that while Scheme code is running SIGINT is ignored
> (unless one is in the repl, or sets up a SIGINT handler oneself).

Ignored why? because GDB sets the handler to SIG_IGN?  Or for some
other reason?