From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16282 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2014 18:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16268 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2014 18:41:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout27.012.net.il Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il (HELO mtaout27.012.net.il) (80.179.55.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:41:20 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N2200A00W5NGS00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:39:01 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N2200BKIX50L520@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:39:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] New option -B: simplify running gdb from build directory In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y50lq2b8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21272.60289.723000.990365@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <834n3aqyaa.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:37:28 -0800 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: gdb-patches > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > From: Doug Evans > > > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:41:21 -0800 > > > > > > I believe I've addressed Eli's comments, > > > [ref: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-12/msg00969.html] > > > > No, I don't think you have. > > That's not much to go on. :-) "Address the comments" in my book means to make changes to accommodate those comments. In contrast, what you did was express your disagreement with my comments. That doesn't seem to fit the bill.