From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23774 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2014 14:39:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23757 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 14:39:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout24.012.net.il Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il (HELO mtaout24.012.net.il) (80.179.55.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:39:25 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NB8008008A3ZS00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:34:32 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NB8001JY8HKW380@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:34:32 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR guile/17247] Block SIGCHLD while initializing Guile In-reply-to: <87ppffabw8.fsf@gnu.org> To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y4u3flr2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <834mwsh2nu.fsf@gnu.org> <8338ccgj78.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppffabw8.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:11:19 +0200 > Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii skribis: > > > In GDB, Guile is just an extension language. I see no catastrophe in > > saying there are some restrictions to what a Guile extension in GDB > > can and cannot do. > > That can be acceptable, but requiring users to re-build Guile and GC > without thread support is not, IMO. Perhaps we should request GC and Guile to provide capabilities to disable threads at run time, then.