From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qDaOO5obb2AQEwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:04:58 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E5DA81EE0E; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421391E01F for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F69394742F; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:04:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8F69394742F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1617894297; bh=IsnwblSfYa/3edHRVRfNHX37vQEkY5Jds5FcslEBJtw=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=QqTPQ6KfRxaoERfOHrraCCoGlymr4PhsXJB6Y7wO4jcTJiRJCUXqzgXMEoYvFsjq9 ZAhE2Tqlgjg2oTMS9Tbg2M0JSFVGYk2xre0u2tqDeDmwQtmuHJ80KuJAkN21KgWvxC YhhR5qJVrE9zi2IIwU3HuELm3TJ0XVO9weXwdxww= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36BDD394443F for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:04:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 36BDD394443F Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUWDH-0007Fs-N1; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:04:55 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4314 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lUWDE-0000oG-07; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:04:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:04:30 +0300 Message-Id: <83y2ds95s1.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tankut Baris Aktemur In-Reply-To: <06e440a9e7a7768166a896b61b92bd571b2fcdc5.1617875845.git.tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> (message from Tankut Baris Aktemur via Gdb-patches on Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:22:36 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gdb/breakpoint: display "N" on MI for disabled-by-condition locations References: <06e440a9e7a7768166a896b61b92bd571b2fcdc5.1617875845.git.tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:22:36 +0200 > From: Tankut Baris Aktemur via Gdb-patches > > For breakpoint locations that are disabled because of an invalid > condition, CLI displays "N*" in the 'enabled' field, where '*' refers > to the footnote below the table: > > (*): Breakpoint condition is invalid at this location. > > This is not necessary for MI, where we shall simply print "N" without > the footnote. > > Update the document to mention the "N" value for the MI. Also remove > the line about the 'enable' field, because there is no such field for > locations. > > gdb/ChangeLog: > 2021-04-08 Tankut Baris Aktemur > > * breakpoint.c (print_one_breakpoint_location): Display "N" for > disabled-by-condition locations on MI-like output. > (breakpoint_1): Do not display the disabled-by-condition footnote > if the output is MI-like. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > 2021-04-08 Tankut Baris Aktemur > > * gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Breakpoint Information): Update the > description for the 'enabled' field of breakpoint locations. OK for the documentation part, thanks.