From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org>
Received: from simark.ca
	by simark.ca with LMTP
	id YVo0IKjFwGCoAwAAWB0awg
	(envelope-from <gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org>)
	for <public-inbox@simark.ca>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:44:08 -0400
Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 755661F163; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 09:44:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6DB41E813
	for <public-inbox@simark.ca>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 09:44:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB4B3973100
	for <public-inbox@simark.ca>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 13:44:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3EB4B3973100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1623246246;
	bh=40Y22Ekr5/Q85rlz6xbuYzLK8MGUr9QNjqDulzu2VLE=;
	h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=kV8Ed/psstViPHuNnUpIYJy0zBTj4mvoqPmkE3V3tZn0ex5x0uXt1sOsx4+aSbJei
	 vjr47Ib7c44EkdUh4qXNcM15qYImHcyQqxwm2gSSeaClFagRXnvITuSHVdCVl0LD/9
	 Fe0OybFbTc9XtHXTD1Q7pXQrwTpq9iNc+osHDk4Y=
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51FA1385701F
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 13:43:47 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 51FA1385701F
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43388)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lqyUj-00066X-PR; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:43:45 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4473
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lqyUj-0005EI-Ao; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:43:45 -0400
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:43:29 +0300
Message-Id: <83y2bjcfwe.fsf@gnu.org>
To: Vasili Burdo <vasili.burdo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANacp63qrmvnj8WSND7Cxo6rvK_CUXm9eqP+xaxZ-pf4XpMg7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Vasili Burdo on Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:16:08 +0300)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TUI disassembly window improvemenmt
References: <CANacp63m7cPtnWOgRduPgk0U4Wj3UnvpXR1H+x=pThh19V4iGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <831r9bdxpj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CANacp63dU8qx-bO1HHe2-kXrXfNsHc0DS2sA0cRxt9Yukvi9vg@mail.gmail.com>
 <83zgvzcho1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CANacp63qrmvnj8WSND7Cxo6rvK_CUXm9eqP+xaxZ-pf4XpMg7Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org
Sender: "Gdb-patches"
 <gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org>

> From: Vasili Burdo <vasili.burdo@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:16:08 +0300
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> Eli, please take look at screenshots I posted: https://imgur.com/a/GlkVXGi
> They show disassembly starting from the same address.

My browser shows nothing there.  Can't you attach the screenshots to
you email messages?

> >if some other function is referenced in the disassembly, it will now be invisible, right?
> No. Only "address" part for disassembly line is changed. "insn" part
> which contains references is intact.

Sorry if I misunderstood.