From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id sHSiHQ72uWKpvQcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:25:18 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 684941E22B; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:25:18 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=gDORS1tQ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC1121E222 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:25:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CEB3851AA2 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:25:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 41CEB3851AA2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1656354316; bh=IvJ5cClcorK54ftFrGs1uVXxPGcpKy5tgBB6iRzE4h8=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=gDORS1tQTWoh8LlINqr6inTZRX6OXBuJeb3wAaA2Z2nKCP8byXjpMYQYU+/5XAKAH ItrBxl5hhUKWaGqVcD5Oo/hAyf8BT8F9qBHYFaHG2o+wD/UliD8+AdeFaDsygieI6P 9XlxsZNnkl6u8VEinbkQijHqI8F7+NV3mLoe25vY= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316F83858C53 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:24:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 316F83858C53 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5tPp-00043y-TM; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:24:53 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1895 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5tPo-0004kM-D0; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:24:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:24:53 +0300 Message-Id: <83y1xi6k22.fsf@gnu.org> To: Pedro Alves In-Reply-To: (message from Pedro Alves on Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:16:33 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gdb, gdbserver: Add AMX registers. References: <20220506121226.137608-1-felix.willgerodt@intel.com> <20220506121226.137608-3-felix.willgerodt@intel.com> <834k2226ht.fsf@gnu.org> <834k1ws3d3.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 19:16:33 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > > On 2022-05-11 12:41, Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches wrote: > >> From: "Willgerodt, Felix" > >> CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > >> Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 08:14:26 +0000 > >> > >>> Please make @cindex entries start with a lower-case letter. > >>> Otherwise, the index could be sorted differently in different locales. > >>> > >> > >> I tried it, it just doesn't look right to me if I don't use capital letters. > >> (Writing "advanced Matrix Extensions" or "advanced matrix extensions".) > >> > >> There are many index entries starting with capital letters, e.g. AArch64, > >> ARM or Ada. I see that Intel MPX is added as "Intel Memory Protection > >> Extensions (MPX)". Features of other vendors/architectures seem to > >> have similar formatting, like "AArch64 SVE" or "AArch64 Memory > >> Tagging Extension". Can I use the same formatting for AMX? > >> E.g. "Intel Advanced Memory Extensions (AMX)". > > > > If you start with "Intel" (or another non-word), yes. > > Hi Eli, > > I'm curious about this. What is different between "Intel" and "Advanced" here, > wrt to locale, since they are both upper case? The locale doesn't matter, but people do. "Intel" is not a word, so it doesn't really matter in what place in the sort order it winds up, as long as we always spell it with the capital "I". But if "Advanced" is in one place and "advanced" is in a very different place, people may have trouble finding one or the other, if they look up stuff in alphabetical order.