From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 2FEfAnyL8mIUxSMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:29:48 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 06C0C1E5EA; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:29:48 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=I14vw4ZS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DE751E222 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 12:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6383856945 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:29:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C6383856945 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1660062584; bh=y1H/8HLOD4eo7qwAgXXwggo1cH10nqURl1lJoHwfOEE=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=I14vw4ZSiOG6oD/2ROrRinxThzS8vhVf5303AjUH0bKb5zYCm8kSpG5IIKxBdNpu7 cBLY/Vdh09fllD1NwCMofihL8u5JVIPt8fR8SyncI5PcXemtGUXANPA2WpC8J0DM+q AnGrMI6sf8wE1SRo07AgO9qzWXV/MVjm/qNZP/Zc= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323873856DCB; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:29:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 323873856DCB Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLS6e-0004IY-Ga; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:29:24 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1060 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oLS6d-0001j0-Vu; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:29:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 19:29:13 +0300 Message-Id: <83y1vxtm7a.fsf@gnu.org> To: Paul Eggert In-Reply-To: <126b860d-0c2c-9fab-a87b-7b97df5ee034@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:49:53 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default References: <20220801075149.1152064-1-luis.machado@arm.com> <959a19b9-b2c3-6638-e0b9-b66ca8328574@simark.ca> <4224183e-e2c1-9a98-7e41-61a58e49aa29@arm.com> <14374ca2-3979-f2d2-2296-a36ba9c615d2@simark.ca> <834jyw2bwd.fsf@gnu.org> <83e592ff-fa28-ddfb-a46d-79db726d2b5e@arm.com> <2958d426-aece-4597-1a6d-ec0981ebb1a6@cs.ucla.edu> <26aee793-5d5a-62c7-38ee-e133db897984@arm.com> <126b860d-0c2c-9fab-a87b-7b97df5ee034@cs.ucla.edu> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: simark@simark.ca, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:49:53 -0700 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, > Eli Zaretskii , Simon Marchi > From: Paul Eggert > > PPS. I couldn't get a 32-bit version of binutils-gdb to build on Fedora > x86-64, even without either of the attached patches. FTR, I regularly do such builds (on native MS-Windows), both the parts used by GDB when I build GDB, and when I build Binutils themselves. I never had any trouble (with the caveat that I didn't yet build the latest Binutils 3.29).