From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id SwH7JzARN2N1oAIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:24 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9B2911E112; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=kVgM3AMs; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4991E0D5 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DDA3854172 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:54:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2DDA3854172 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1664553264; bh=SNaXjGt0FCnsy64poRxE3Iy07thptEfufWfCwNR82xY=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=kVgM3AMswGArkYaGG/1g7eOkMU+OdFBA/7CRhYsm5kJsAaxQDLPJsQYsI6OlxSrKu sdZez0YzALZz0NpPOK+xGImrI5tn9dNQtKZ4r3LjMoxfL1wYQDYhs5SOb7k/wD0Xmj Gejn6l7eMo67UWLp0JCQI2OOgr2OcU09FIMpiHt0= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A26A3854835 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:54:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6A26A3854835 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeIKx-0004KY-NW; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:03 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2436 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeIKx-0006hk-AQ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:54:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:53:49 +0300 Message-Id: <83y1u0dfjm.fsf@gnu.org> To: Pedro Alves In-Reply-To: <8ed127eb-221b-2b85-1019-1968060f68bc@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:50:20 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] gdb/python doc: Move unwinder skeleton code References: <20220528115509.3865342-1-ptsneves@gmail.com> <20220603160139.136115-1-ptsneves@gmail.com> <20220603160139.136115-4-ptsneves@gmail.com> <83wndxbtwn.fsf@gnu.org> <8ed127eb-221b-2b85-1019-1968060f68bc@palves.net> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: ptsneves@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:50:20 +0100 > > So I think the manual should be fixed by dropping the "or @code{gdb}", resulting in: > > Passing @code{None} adds @var{unwinder} to the @value{GDBN}'s global unwinder list. > > Actually, the "the" in "to the @value{GDBN}'s" looks wrong to me. So I think we > should really say: > > Passing @code{None} adds @var{unwinder} to @value{GDBN}'s global unwinder list. How about If @var{locus} is @code{None}, that stands for @value{GDBN}'s global unwinder list. I think this is clearer and less likely to cause misinterpretation.