From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20448 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2009 18:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 20438 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2009 18:29:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:29:38 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KNT00100CABLJ00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:29:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.149.138]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KNT00LG1CPA8X40@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:29:34 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:29:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Add dump and load command to process record and replay In-reply-to: To: Hui Zhu Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ws5koinl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4A749572.7030005@vmware.com> <4A75054C.9030304@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 > From: Hui Zhu > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:11:46 +0800 > Cc: gdb-patches ml > > I make a new patch according to your mail. It depend on patch in > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-08/msg00015.html Thanks. > +@var{pid} is is the PID of the inferior process. ^^^^^ Two "is" in a row; one is redundant. Otherwise, I'm happy now. By the way, does it make sense to make the dump file portable, so that another host that supports debugging the same target could then use it?