From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8968 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2009 08:39:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 8959 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2009 08:39:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:39:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KNZ00H00ZTM8Y00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:39:33 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.151.173]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KO000L3D01WPAD0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:39:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Add dump and load command to process record and replay In-reply-to: To: Hui Zhu Cc: msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ws5gm30b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83my6fo2pa.fsf@gnu.org> <4A78935B.5030508@vmware.com> <4A79F802.4060102@vmware.com> <83ab2docqi.fsf@gnu.org> <4A7B99B3.40407@vmware.com> <4A7B9F49.9030202@vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 > From: Hui Zhu > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:34:20 +0800 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > I think a warning is clear to most of people. > > And when he get this warning. He can delete the record list and load > again. He will lost nothing. > > If we delete the old record list, maybe he still need old record. He > will lost something. Instead of a warning, how about asking the user whether to discard the old records or keep them?