From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24643 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2009 20:18:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 24631 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2009 20:18:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:18:14 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KSW00A00TKQY900@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:17:42 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KSW008Z7TPHKC50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:17:42 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:18:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Remove m68k-elf special cases from gdb.trace In-reply-to: <200911101937.27789.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: stan@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83ws1ynnkg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20091102012332.GA31878@caradoc.them.org> <200911101249.03859.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4AF9ADBE.4060409@codesourcery.com> <200911101937.27789.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:37:27 +0000 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder > > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 18:15:26, Stan Shebs wrote: > > Pedro Alves wrote: > > > > gdb/agentexpr.texi has section "Tracing on Symmetrix" that I > > > think should be dropped as well. > > > > > Agreed. It's an interesting historical tidbit, but historians can go dig > > up an old rev if they really want to research it. > > Should be obvious, but... Okay? Yes.