From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29059 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2010 17:45:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 28991 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2010 17:45:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:44:58 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L1J00F00QEFWE00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:44:44 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.125.239]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L1J00BUVQMC0SC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:44:44 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:45:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [python][patch] Add GDB Parameters functionality In-reply-to: <4BD6D7C7.9040804@redhat.com> To: Phil Muldoon Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wrvsyelz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4BD592D9.1070801@redhat.com> <838w8ayu7a.fsf@gnu.org> <4BD6D7C7.9040804@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00915.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:19:21 +0100 > From: Phil Muldoon > > Thanks, I've made the changes. I would like you to have another look > at them. See below. > > Maybe we should consider mentioning this in NEWS. > > > I thought I attached this to the original patch. Indeed, you did. Sorry that I missed it. It is okay. > +Parameters are exposed to the user via the @code{set} and > +@code{show} commands. @xref{Help}. ^^ Two spaces, please. > +@item PARAM_STRING > +The value is a string. When the user modifies the string, any escapes > +sequences are translated and encoded by @value{GDBN}. I asked to say something about this translation, or provide an example. > +@item PARAM_FILENAME > +The value is a filename (a string). This value is has to be a valid > +filename. ^^ The "is" part is probably redundant. Also, what does it mean "a valid filename"? Does it have to exist, for example? If not, what makes a file name "invalid"? Thanks.