From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26780 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2010 18:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 26771 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2010 18:43:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:42:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9500E00VW7Y100@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:42:53 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.203.3]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9500E4NVZEIWF0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:42:52 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:19:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR python/11792 In-reply-to: <20100922182504.GA3007@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wrqdvcup.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pqwzkeyi.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkw0j15r.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6bkhy8d.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwx2w37j.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6atve9j.fsf@gnu.org> <20100922182504.GA3007@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:25:04 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > I didn't intend to. > > But why? Aren't we supposed to post all patches that get checked in? Yes. We are also supposed to humor the responsible maintainer when she asks for some simple change as part of the review process.