From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76586-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8495 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2010 03:51:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 8483 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2010 03:51:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:51:21 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCB00K00JTZWV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:51:18 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.52.47]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCB00KL5K1HHW90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 05:51:18 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 03:51:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [2/2] RFA: --with-system-readline -vs- gdb.texinfo
In-reply-to: <m3aal16n4t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83wro48zo3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3lj4p9gpc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83hbfdarps.fsf@gnu.org> <m3aal16n4t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:53:38 -0700
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> Eli> A copy/paste error?
> 
> Yes.  Here is a revised patch.

OK for the doco part.  Thanks.