From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16550 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2011 18:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 16477 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2011 18:29:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:29:06 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG300E00TMEFD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:29:04 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG300DHIVCEUYB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:29:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:29:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [doc/gdbint] Mention some formatting guidelines for casts and unary operators In-reply-to: <201102041701.40260.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wrlfac21.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201102011628.32860.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83zkqfeghr.fsf@gnu.org> <201102041701.40260.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:01:39 +0000 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Friday 04 February 2011 18:50:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Pedro Alves > > > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:28:32 +0000 > > > > > > Okay? > > > > Yes, but please use ``@minus{}'' instead of ``-'' to produce the minus > > sign. ``-'' produces a dash character, which is typeset slightly > > differently in the printed version of the manual. > > Hmm, I'm confused. You mean @minus within @code{}? No, I meant @minus{}@code{x}. But if that doesn't look right in print (or PDF), feel free to disregard and use your original text. > But it does indeed typeset a bit differently on html > at least. Did I get that "@code{@minus{}x}" right? Yes.