From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84931-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24051 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 09:01:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 24039 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 09:01:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:01:11 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LU400H00P1BPZ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:01:00 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.70.69]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LU400H3EP1NG7B0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:01:00 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:01:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] Include wallclock time in "maint time" output.
In-reply-to: <CADPb22QOYBHK03zWMgM5DSVqNv3jgQ_dgDYmk1vB5W8FOmcaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83wrbgl0rz.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
References: <20110920041137.A67D02461A0@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <E1R5svz-00078r-L3@fencepost.gnu.org> <CADPb22R9ocuaKYqvABFapetE-MhhGLWLZmmH-ffgQ8WXZipFDQ@mail.gmail.com> <E1R5uSD-0003ho-IM@fencepost.gnu.org> <CADPb22QOYBHK03zWMgM5DSVqNv3jgQ_dgDYmk1vB5W8FOmcaUQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:17:08 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >> The part about time not being printed for commands that run the target
> >> is not true.
> >
> > The CPU time still accounts for GDB only, right?  It sounds like we
> > interpret this sentence differently, so perhaps it should be reworded
> > rather than being deleted.
> 
> You'll need to tell me how you interpret it.

The text of the patch you attached is fine with me, but I would
suggest to use "@sc{cpu}" instead of just "cpu", I think the former
looks better in print.

Thanks.