From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28690 invoked by alias); 9 May 2012 19:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 28682 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2012 19:21:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 19:21:29 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3R00J00R0P2200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:20:09 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3R00JECSDI1W60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:20:06 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:21:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [doc patch] path vs. directory separator [Re: [patch 2/2] Implement multi-component --with-auto-load-dir] In-reply-to: <20120509184341.GA22045@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wr4lyxhi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120509154847.GB12692@host2.jankratochvil.net> <834nrp1c2s.fsf@gnu.org> <20120509184341.GA22045@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:43:41 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On Wed, 09 May 2012 19:47:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > +may be delimited by the host platform directory separator in use. > > > > I believe the correct term is "path separator". I suggest to say > > > > (@samp{:} on Unix, @samp{;} on Windows and DOS) > > > > for clarity here, and not further down. > > This means current doc needs there fixes, doesn't it? Yes, please.