From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24921 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2014 15:32:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24884 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jul 2014 15:32:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout26.012.net.il Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il (HELO mtaout26.012.net.il) (80.179.55.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:32:36 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N8C00900LKYJS00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:28:21 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N8C00179LN9UR80@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:28:21 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:32:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix documentation for Type.template_argument. In-reply-to: <20140707144250.GE6038@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: jlebar@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wqbpchgz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1403649524-10769-1-git-send-email-jlebar@google.com> <20140707144250.GE6038@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 07:42:50 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Ping on this patch? (Would it be appropriate to find the last person > > to touch this documentation and cc him/her, or do something else like > > that?) > > No, Eli is the person to review this patch, not the last person to > touch it. Maybe he is away at the moment. I'm not away, I just remembered that I already reviewed this patch and responded with the review on the same day. It looks now that my response didn't make it to the list for some reason, because I see it in my FCC archive, but not in the list archives. So here's my response as I wrote it back then: > From: Justin Lebar > Cc: Justin Lebar > Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 12:01:36 -0700 > > -If this @code{gdb.Type} is not a template type, this will throw an > -exception. Ordinarily, only C@t{++} code will have template types. > +If this @code{gdb.Type} is not a template type, or if the type has fewer > +than N template arguments, this will throw an exception. Ordinarily, ^ @var{n} Otherwise, the patch is OK Texinfo-wise; I don't know enough about these issues to tell whether the content is correct, nor can I answer your question. Thanks.