From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12762 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2014 03:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12749 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2014 03:48:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout24.012.net.il Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il (HELO mtaout24.012.net.il) (80.179.55.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:48:07 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NEW00M00PLDG700@mtaout24.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:40:37 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NEW00KLVQ7PKO30@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:40:37 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 03:48:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Update documentation on catching a group of related syscalls. In-reply-to: <87ppctkwcz.fsf@krisman.be> To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wq71krkh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1414956944-8856-1-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <1414956944-8856-5-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <83vbmxwfnk.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppctkwcz.fsf@krisman.be> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 > From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:04:28 -0200 > > >> +related syscalls, by passing the argument @code{group:network} to > >> +@code{catch syscall}. > > > > How does one know which groups, if any, exist? > > > > Indeed, as I said in part 0, I don't provide any way to list which group > exists, other than the usual word completion. The reason is that catch > syscall does not provide a way to list system calls and we couldn't > agree on the right syntax for this feature on the RFC I sent earlier to > this list. > > Maybe I could rewrite this part of the documentation to suggest > something like "Tab is your friend". WDYT? :) Yes, saying that TAB-completion (including M-TAB) can be used to see the list of groups is fine with me. Thanks.