From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21406 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2014 09:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21393 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2014 09:26:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout29.012.net.il Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il (HELO mtaout29.012.net.il) (80.179.55.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:26:22 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF000M00V5LE000@mtaout29.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:24:34 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF000GBPVGYSU30@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:24:34 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: gnulib's errno module was imported In-reply-to: <87k32yi3ql.fsf@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gregory.0xf0@gmail.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83wq6yi152.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oasaibe6.fsf@codesourcery.com> <83389mjkxk.fsf@gnu.org> <87k32yi3ql.fsf@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 > From: Yao Qi > CC: , > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:30:10 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Is it possible to back out dirfd, and then add to GDB whatever glue > > (borrowed from gnulib) that's needed to support LSB 3.0? IOW, can we > > support LSB 3.0 in our own code, either inspired or stolen from > > gnulib? > > We can do that but I suspect the value of doing that. How important is > it to keep GDB head compatible with LSB 3.0 which was released on 2005? I don't know. I assumed that supporting LSB 3.0 was important; if not, then just backing out dirfd, as you suggested, is TRT.