From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2073 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2019 16:19:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2060 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2019 16:19:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:19:29 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJh5r-0003fm-Qr; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:19:27 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3257 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hJh5r-0002mO-5r; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:19:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83wojixdl0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: lrn1986@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87zhoeaxuu.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:49:45 -0600) Subject: Re: Warning when using separate debug info file References: <83y348edoi.fsf@gnu.org> <20439f48-c0ff-e4b2-5cfc-6bb4b594d88c@gmail.com> <83h8aveape.fsf@gnu.org> <66d48dfd-23ac-7e05-3ad8-4e65b0c1c7f9@gmail.com> <834l6vdv4y.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1fjfbio.fsf@tromey.com> <83mukf19dl.fsf@gnu.org> <87y33yci4w.fsf@tromey.com> <838svyyvql.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhoeaxuu.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , lrn1986@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:49:45 -0600 > > The section isn't needed in the separate debug file -- only in the > stripped file. What is wrong here is the section flags. So you are saying the bug is actually in the MinGW port of objcopy? Which section flag should not be there?