From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5324 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2019 16:26:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5315 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2019 16:26:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=emails X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:26:24 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL8bW-0008QT-9Z; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:26:22 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4186 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iL8bT-0004RO-Ji; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:26:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83wod39w4j.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:55:02 -0400) Subject: Re: Gerrit emails References: <83eezbdewk.fsf@gnu.org> <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca> <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org> <6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:55:02 -0400 > > I don't think that Reply-to header is so important for us. On the > list, I presume everybody just does "Reply all". I certainly do (except in very rare special occasions). Thanks.