From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id plaoDQZ70GAbOgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:41:58 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2B7581F1F2; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:41:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604671E54D for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA16B3938397 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:41:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA16B3938397 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1624275716; bh=yZTDUnOhkt0QZsTfGJo8faGzTtvbU8hsEWETo2VZdis=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=S5nQcvd97yE3dfIoinXemSIt0diT1XHKsQp6+tsEQLmQ4c7DceFNU6RuMbYXL07LU /J4IIJ4vwdJYLlnYGFOe3uDquciT+xUPhpTGc65ON+PrrSbrpV7egyqt2sSP4cv/9m l8RSsniA4uCYOIGQqxnTY2Zq5M5QJSQ3Sa51l618= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3A7383F436 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:41:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6D3A7383F436 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvIJ6-0001Th-6F; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:41:36 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1045 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvIJ5-0000sg-PZ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:41:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:41:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83wnqntpgj.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andrew Burgess In-Reply-To: <20210621110420.GB2568@embecosm.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:04:20 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] gdb/riscv: add support for vector registers in target descriptions References: <20210505094639.1551740-1-andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> <20210621110420.GB2568@embecosm.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:04:20 +0100 > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, nelson.chu@sifive.com, jimw@sifive.com, > jhb@freebsd.org, Eli Zaretskii > > Thanks for feedback on v1. > > I agree that there is a very small risk that the vector register set > could change for the final version of the spec, but like you both seem > to say, this seems unlikely. > > And even if it did change I don't think changing the requirements of > the feature for a later release of GDB would be that bad. > > So, I'm proposing that once this has had a doc review, I'll get this > merged, hopefully in time for the next release (of GDB). > > In v2: > > - Fixed the f-register/v-register typo that Jim pointed out, > - Added documentation of the new feature to the manual, > - Added a NEWS entry, > - Updated the commit message to mention that the vector extension is > still in draft. Thanks, the documentation parts are okay.