From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22413 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2009 20:56:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22405 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2009 20:56:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:55:55 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KIF0030039XI000@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:55:52 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.219.161]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KIF003N03GZ2EL0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:55:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:56:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: install-html and install-pdf improvements In-reply-to: <49ECD20C.9030100@codesourcery.com> To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vdozgi3r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83hc0njo9e.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpqvjg96.fsf@gnu.org> <83skk6ifjr.fsf@gnu.org> <49ECD20C.9030100@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:50:36 -0400 > From: Carlos O'Donell > CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > The goal was to take a step towards behaving like the newer autoconf > would behave, and to allow independent configuration for each directory. > > There should be values of docdir and datarootdir defined in > gdb/doc/Makefile.in, and if not specified, the values of pdfdir and > htmldir should be set to defaults as defined in the GNU Coding Standard. > > The patch does not implement this last requirement, but that was the idea. Thanks for the explanations. Is it possible to do this as you describe, including the last requirement? I'd prefer to have a setup with no lose ends, because a year from now, none of us is likely to remember what we intended to do, and someone some day will wonder what is this all about. But if adding the missing pieces is beyond your current resources, I won't fight; go ahead and commit the changes. Thanks.