From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79161-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19084 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2011 07:37:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 18976 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2011 07:37:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:37:05 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LHI00300VQ2UR00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:37:02 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.183.216]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LHI0037KVTOGB90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:37:02 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:37:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: change "program exited" message
In-reply-to: <201103032120.49764.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83vczzibiz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3ei6ovsf3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201103032120.49764.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:20:49 +0000
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks for address this.  It's an overdue change.
> 
> On Thursday 03 March 2011 20:51:44, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > This patch changes GDB to print:
> > 
> >     [Inferior 25036 exited normally]
> 
> That number is the PID, but "Inferior" should go with
> GDB's inferior id, otherwise, it's quite confusing.
> 
> >     [Inferior 25036 exited normally]
> 
> I suggest, modelled on how we print threads:
> 
> "[Inferior " + inferior->num + "(" target_pid_to_string (pid_to_ptid (inf->pid)) + ")" + $whathappened + "]"
> 
> Should render on Linux as:
> 
> [Inferior 1 (process 25036) exited normally]
> 
> and against remote targets when gdb doesn't
> know the target pid:
> 
> [Inferior 1 (Remote target) exited normally]

I agree with this.  It is important that "New process 25036" and
whatever we display when that process exits have some words in common.