From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81159-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21530 invoked by alias); 20 May 2011 07:26:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 21510 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2011 07:26:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 07:25:59 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LLH00B00GLR8I00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 10:25:30 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.254.13]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LLH00AZQGMHC8B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 May 2011 10:25:30 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 07:26:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Anonymous namespaces and linespecs
In-reply-to: <4DD59F1C.6040608@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83vcx5g7f7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4DD59F1C.6040608@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00470.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:52:12 -0700
> From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
> 
> (gdb) b 'FOO::(anonymous namespace)::BAR()'
> Junk at end of arguments.
> 
> 
> This is happening because along with the physname patch, there was also 
> alot of mucking around with decode_line_1 and decode_compound. This is 
> fallout from that. [Remember: we used to push almost everything through 
> decode_variable -- in which the quoting is /required/.]
> 
> If we see "(anonymous namespace)", we must keep it as a significant part 
> of the name. On the upside, we now no longer have to quote this stuff, 
> either.

This "(anonymous namespace)" thing is not documented anywhere in the
user manual.  Should it be?