From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13752 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2012 04:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 13742 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Feb 2012 04:00:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:00:43 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M0400G00YWEFD00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:00:37 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.119.92]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M0400G2XZ4UF770@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:00:31 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 04:17:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [doc RFA] Re: [PATCH] Allow user-defined as a category for python gdb macros (resend) In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: scottjg@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vcmqcmn5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03D72B653F@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> <4F3A5820.3080905@redhat.com> <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03D72B6547@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03DAB7AED1@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03D72B6554@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03D72B6555@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> <03E840D17E263A48A5766AD576E0423A03DAB7B84A@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00688.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:27:33 -0800 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Phil Muldoon > > I was about to check this in (after fixing a few whitespace issues), > and noticed a missing bit of doc. > > Eli, ok to check in? Yes, thanks.